Predict Smart: Use Data, Find Answers, Fulfill the Mission

Big data in government will vastly improve decision-making, but getting there requires seismic shifts in attitudes and cooperation

Mark Forman

Sometimes people only see what they want to see. The dichotomy of our times is that government collects voluminous rich data, with over 260,000 datasets being made public and many more considered too sensitive for eyes other than those with a need to know. Yet, too often, too many policy and operations decisions are made on gut instinct and political popularity rather than data.

Some questions are portentous. What are terrorists plotting, and what actions will thwart them? What strain of flu is coming this winter, what vaccine will protect the most vulnerable, and must it be rationed? With demands that the opioid crisis placed on the foster family network, what programs are needed by affected children? What highway investments will best reduce traffic accidents?

Some questions are urgent, and decisions cannot wait for an in-depth study. What havoc will tomorrow’s blizzard create at which airports? A massive forest fire burns out of control; what citizens and buildings are in its path, what actions should be taken, and how should they be prioritized?

Others are more customary, involving longstanding programs with massive budget outlays and enduring political interest group support. In a period of strong economic growth, what adjustments are needed in programs serving SNAP recipients to help them increase their incomes and self-sufficiency? As the population ages, what regional demographic shifts will occur, and what is the impact on federal agency regional operations?

There is a huge premium on arriving at the right answers. Even when lives are not at stake, budgets and credibility are at risk, and getting it wrong invites very public criticism, even recrimination. In OMB Memorandum M-19-23, Acting Director Russell Vought stated, “Despite previous efforts and resource commitments, federal agencies often lack the data and evidence necessary to make critical decisions about program operations, policy, and regulations and to gain visibility into the impact of resource allocation on achieving program objectives."

Vought continued: "Investing in and focusing on the management and use of data and evidence across the federal government will enable agencies to shift away from low-value activities toward actions that will support decision-makers: linking spending to program outputs, delivering on mission, better managing enterprise risks, and promoting civic engagement and transparency.”


Congress has passed laws (such as the Evidence-Based Policymaking Act, Results Act, Government Performance and Results Act, and DATA Act), and the Trump administration’s Federal Data Strategy and Action Plans are focused on putting the people and tools in place. There is much work to do.

Skill sets and organizations will evolve, leading to better algorithms and analysis of existing data in order to improve program results and operating efficiency. That, in turn, will require integration of third-party data or new data collection, modifications of existing systems or creation of new ones, and reshaping of operations and policies. Transparency will bring new, independent analyses of the datasets, leading to new solutions that may benefit the public on one hand while on the other hand threaten longstanding assumptions of groups that have had key roles in determining program budgets.

In the near term, we are uncovering innovative ways every day for agencies to use technology to extract sound insights from oceans of data in furtherance of their missions:

  • Integrating child welfare data with other systems (birth and death certificates, public assistance programs, criminal records) and employing algorithms can enable child welfare agencies to rapidly match programs to needs and thus improve lives and allocate resources wisely.
  • Replacing manual paperwork with AI tools, such as logistics management best practices that reduce queues at border crossings and risk algorithms that reduce false positives, can rapidly sort travelers and trucks. Border agents can receive timely, tailored, detailed information that helps them spot risks and prioritize searches and make better and more efficient use of their time, easing the flow of travelers and cargo.
  • Restoring computer systems and preventing infection can be had by doing rapid analysis of cyber threats. Then, using AI to apply tools that lock in those threats to points in the network where they can be assessed without harm, can protect systems, operations, and privacy of citizen data held by that agency.

At this point, an acknowledgment is du rigueur: All these breakthroughs depend to some degree on widespread data sharing, which many agencies are reluctant to do. Discussions of AI and algorithms inevitably involve concerns over model quality and whether the level of false positives is so high that it makes the predictive value more harmful than good.

Collection, sharing, and use of data is not automatic and will require considerations of privacy trade-offs, while concerns about security of data grow. These are all worthy concerns and are part of what the Federal Data Strategy is addressing under its “ethical governance” remit. Even countries that are more rivals than allies understand the important role of careful sharing of data in the interest of security.

Posted by: Mark Forman

VP, Digital Government Strategy

Mark Forman is vice president of digital government strategy for SAIC. In this role, he is responsible for is leveraging deep domain expertise across the SAIC solutions portfolio to provide digital solutions important to U.S. Federal government clients. This includes data analytics, applications modernization, and hybrid cloud services using techniques including low code, containerization, and cloud native. He also co-chairs the SAIC CARES Solutions Task Force.

Forman is an accomplished thought leader with more than 30 years of professional work experience in industry and government, including a Presidential appointment to be the first U.S. Administrator for E-Government and Information Technology, the Federal Government’s Chief Information Officer.

Prior to joining SAIC in 2020 as part of its acquisition of Unisys Federal Systems, Forman was global industry vice president and global head of Unisys Public Sector. In that role, he designed and implemented the successful repositioning of Unisys as a global provider of solutions for Digital Government, Justice, Law Enforcement, Border Security, and Social Services. During his tenor, the Public Sector teams grew rapidly in both new clients and base business expansion, achieving nearly $1 billion in new contracts.

Before joining Unisys, Forman was vice president for IT Services and Cloud Solutions at TASC, Inc./Engility Corp., where his group assisted government agencies in transitioning to the cloud by providing advanced systems engineering, integration and decision-support services to the federal government. This work included building a high quality team of consultants and engineers that developed IT Modernization Roadmaps, a modern IT governance framework, and deployed the Federal Emergency Management Agencies first hybrid cloud environment.

Forman is past President and Co-founder of Government Transaction Services, Inc. which was established in 2010 to be the leading provider of cloud-based business process and transaction services enabling interaction with the federal government. Forman left KPMG LLP in January 2011, where he was a Principal/Partner and the Practice Leader of KPMG’s Federal Performance and Technology Advisory Practice. In this role, Forman created a rapidly growing organization of about 170 consultants assisting federal agencies in business transformation initiatives.

From 2001 through 2003, Forman was the first administrator for E-Government and IT at the Office of Management and Budget, where he instituted most of the Federal IT budgeting and governance processes in use today. From 1997 to late 2000, Forman was a principal in IBM Global Services where he went from leading a federal government practice to creating and growing the national Public Sector e-Business Consulting Services, which he then extended to IBM’s Global Public Sector e-Business Strategy Services practice.

From March 1990 through February 1997, he was a lead staff member in the U.S. Senate for legislative reforms in place today including: Defense and government-wide management, major acquisition programs, and IT and weapons acquisition. He also conducted oversight and investigations on horror stories in major government projects.

Forman holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from The Ohio State University and a master’s degree in public policy analysis from University of Chicago. He currently serves on the Social Security Administration Advisory Board IT Panel and previously served on the Board of Directors for Corio Inc. and the Advisory Board for PureEdge prior to their acquisition by IBM.



Read other blog posts from Mark Forman >

Connect with Mark Forman: linkedin icon

< Return to Blogs